Population Controls On Humanity - Can We Do That?

Not extended ago, I met a gentleman who was pretty concerned about humanities more than population challenges, in truth so a great deal so he'd written a book about the subject. He had outlined all the issues that humans face in the future; water, power, pollution, sources, fishing, meals, wars, space, and so forth. At initially, I believed properly, you know, this is an old subject. Confident it is, but humans have only continued to raise population bases, probably at a slower price, but not all nations, religions, or cultures have gotten on board with the notion of obtaining fewer offspring.

Can our Earth help continued population development to the tune of let's say 55 billion in 2150? Boy that is a great deal of people today, and it appears we'd absolutely run out of points if we had that lots of, and if they all had automobiles, homes, and ate like Americans, nicely that could possibly not operate, and what about the power usage? Yes, all significant problems no doubt. Can we resolve this problem by expanding to other worlds? What about operating out of sources, fossil fuels, water, meals, and so on., yes there are all points, but let's speak since I have a entire series of tips to support avoid the population collapse of humanity:

Here are some counterpoints I'd like to talk about:

1.) Carbon material and Hydrogen Fuel
2.) Mining Asteroids
three.) Producing Humans Smaller sized (genetically)
four.) Previous Period Ocean Collapses and Recovery
5.) We are dinosaurs, through Smaller sized rodents and tree shrews
six.) Adjust economy to contain units of trade for original believed not just production
7.) What About Life from Space - Andromena Strain?
eight.) Reaching Human Population Infinity through saving minds in the cloud
9.) Earth attracts 1000 tons of space dust per year
10.) Molecular dissimilation recycling (100% effective) + three-D molecular printing
11.) Ice Age will resolve human population problem if we do not in a Confident or damaging way
12.) Jevon's Paradox much less than relevant if we move to hydrogen fuel and economy is adjusted
13.) Adjusted population development numbers taking into consideration 3rd world infant mortality prices
14.) 50 Billion on Earth may be achievable (#three above) plus other techniques making use of technologies, but not preferable
15.) 10 Billion humans could possibly be safer than 1 Billion for evolutionary diversity if collapse occurs through unknown threat

Nonetheless, even with these factors of contention or intellectual debates, the realities of population development at some point will want to be pretty close to zero development at some point to make certain mankind's survival, and the sooner the far better. E-mail me if you'd like to start a additional in-depth and intellectual debate on this subject. Please consider all this and feel on it.

Lance Winslow has launched a new provocative series of eBooks on Future Suggestions. Lance Winslow is a retired Founder of a Nationwide Franchise Chain, and now runs the On the internet Consider Tank; http://www.worldthinktank.net