Leopold Bloom's Exile Versus Stephen Dedalus' Exile in Ulysses

Each of Joyce's protagonists in Ulysses, Leopold Bloom and Stephen Dedalus, are alienated, marginalized, and exilic figures of the Dublin society. Concerning Edward Said's view, exile in contemporary occasions, usually in colonial and postcolonial societies, does not just refer to the political dissidents, but it contains the folks who are alienated amid their native culture and inside their motherland/language. Thinking about Ireland's colonial situation, which is on the verge of a transition into the well-known modernity of twentieth century, Bloom and Stephen as two outstanding representatives of Dublin life, reveal a element of life at that historical period of Dublin.

James Joyce in his masterpiece introduces, at least, two sorts of exilic figures representing two distinct groups: a Dublin-Jew-Intellectual and a Dublin-Artist-Intellectual. The Dublin-Jew-intellectual, Leopold Bloom is an actual exilic figure in Dublin, since his father's origin goes back to Hungary not Ireland. In addition to, his original religion has been Jewish in the fiercely catholic atmosphere of Ireland dominated by the effective Catholic Church. He tends to be an intellectual with a "touch of artist" who knows how to behave females, in contrast to -at least- Blazes Boylan.

To make a lengthy story brief, Bloom is the Dublin Jew who criticizes "injustice" about the globe, and professes for freedom, peace, and education for all, men and ladies. He need to be a marginal character in presence of the men and women like Citizen and his supportive institutions of him, such as, British and Catholic Church imperials. On the other side of the story, there is a young Stephen Dedalus, who is properly identified from Portrait for his rebellious character. The young Dedalus's major concern and wish has been to devote almost everything to turn into a accurate artist. His radical rejection of all the standard authority symbolizes his liberating and, of course, intellectual reaction. He is such a radical character that denies the legality and genuineness of Irish national art by comparing Irish art to a "cracked seeking glass of a servant" (U 46).

In rejecting this, Stephen may possibly have in thoughts rejection of any national and social belongings, which has been infected by the presence of the two exploiting dominated forces in Ireland. He is in search of a liberating art, which may well offer you him an independent identity other than a biological identity.